Burned out cars are seen in southern Israel following Hamas' Oct. 7 attack.

Social Media Review Exposes Pro-Hamas Bias of International Human Rights Organizations

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

In a review of social media posts over the weekend, Combat Antisemitism Movement (CAM) CEO Sacha Roytman Dratwa uncovered a consistent pattern of pro-Hamas bias in content published by major international human rights organizations about the war in Israel.

The information compiled is detailed here:

Doctors Without Borders (@MSF) —

▪️ 20 tweets providing updates on the situation.
▪️ 18 tweets on IDF responses to Hamas actions, without a single word about Hamas.
▪️ 2 tweets addressing both Hamas crimes and IDF retaliation.
▪️ 0 tweets reporting or condemning Hamas attacks on civilians only.

Amnesty International (@amnesty) —

▪️ 20 tweets providing updates on the situation.
▪️ 11 tweets on IDF responses to Hamas actions, without a single word about Hamas.
▪️ 6 tweets addressing both Hamas crimes and IDF retaliation.
▪️ 3 tweets reporting or condemning Hamas attacks on Israeli civilians only.

UNICEF (@UNICEF) —

▪️ 8 tweets providing updates on the situation.
▪️ 4 tweets on IDF responses to Hamas actions, without a single word about Hamas.
▪️ 4 tweets addressing both Hamas crimes and IDF retaliation.
▪️ o tweets reporting or condemning Hamas attacks on Israeli civilians only.

Human Rights Watch (@hrw) —

▪️ 86 tweets providing updates on the situation.
▪️ 36 tweets on IDF responses to Hamas actions, without a single word about Hamas.
▪️ 47 tweets addressing both Hamas crimes and IDF retaliation.
▪️ 3 tweets reporting or condemning Hamas attacks on civilians only.

“I would have expected humanitarian organizations to exhibit humanity by condemning the inhuman actions of Hamas,” Roytman Dratwa commented.

See Roytman Dratwa’s full X thread below:

Similar bias can be found when looking in greater depth at a sampling of statements put out by human rights organizations in the days following Hamas’ massacre of more than 1,300 Israelis on Oct. 7, and its kidnapping of 200 others.

B’tselem, for example, insidiously referred to Israeli military strikes against Hamas in Gaza as acts of “revenge,” disregarding Israel’s right to defend itself from future attacks and painting a false moral equivalence between the IDF and Hamas.

Meanwhile, Amnesty International sought to shift the blame for Hamas’ barbarity to Israel, positing, “Without addressing the root causes of this violence, including impunity for war crimes by all sides and Israel’s system of apartheid imposed on Palestinians, civilians will continue to pay the price.

Omar Shakir, Israel and Palestine Director for Human Rights Watch, accused Israel of wanting to have all Gaza residents “collectively punished,” ignoring the great lengths Israel has gone to avoid harming innocent civilians, including the issuing of advanced warnings to evacuate conflict zones where Hamas terror sites — all legitimate military targets — are present.

The International Human Rights Foundation condemned the “bombing of medical facilities” on Tuesday, despite the fact that Islamic Jihad, not Israel, was culpable for the Al-Ahli Arab Hospital incident being referred to.

Furthermore, the International Federation for Human Rights propagated two lies against Israel in one post — claiming it was perpetrating “mass displacement attempts” and “indiscriminate civilian killings” in Gaza.

read more

Join Our Newsletter​

Free to Your Inbox

"*" indicates required fields

Consent*
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More News